A flat excise examine?
Since goverment and Corperations are address our
personal human shortcomings and defect, and want us to be
over tax and restricted starting near smoking, over weight
Why not a flat tariff for adjectives, Pride,Greed,Lust,Anger,Glutton...
Envy,Sloth & Lies.
Answers:
Haha! Good hypothesis! The falt export tax wants to transpire, 20% of what you formulate every year, no deduction would def. payoff contained by America! But the function for individuals wanting to export tax what you mentioned is because it is a financial drain to society, whereas the other mortal sins are not... or are they? LOL.
au contraire, Martin.
flat levy is a poor concept.
America, and other countries, should abolish income taxes completely and switch to taxing consumption instead. A national merit added export tax of equal percentage [17 to 20 percent] would give up ample revenue while increasing individuals's income and thus reducing poverty.
All taxes perform to mute the number of the amusement tax. This is covered surrounded by Economics 001 at university.
you settle on ... do you want to drop off the amount of work done, or would it be better to drain the amount of consumption done?
A flat levy would shift much of the duty burden from soaring income to low and middle income folks, but still would not do anything to excise the underground cutback - sounds similar to a genuine doomed to failure notion to me.
Good for you! However; Why not basically a simple 10% flat excise time? if respectively human being, respectively business, respectively corporation and adjectives foriegn investors compensated 10% of their proceeds, regardless of their losses, surrounded by a few years in that would be no inevitability for taxes every year and we'd be required to clear them every third year at the soonest.
Large corporations find to subtract their losses from their incom total and that's BS. If a personality cannot take off their losses from their income neither should a company. What really stinks almost the system is that a company is considered living - hah - I've never see a "company" at a dinner table across from me in any resteraunt. A company is simply one or more individuals, similar to you and me and and so respectively individual owner that reap any financial benefit from their company's existence should take-home pay 10% of that benefit and as a total the company should earnings 10% . You can't hold a loss in need have some sort of money to switch on next to. Please don't make clear to me that AT&T lost 2 Billion dollars within profit one year - heck, AT&T be still competent to repay it's owners a considerable amount of money and be competent to pay envelope it's workforce so why couldn't it settle up it's 10%? Oh, that's right, it's because the owners would enjoy gotten smaller number money. Guess what, that also finances their 10% would own be smaller number as in good health. What's $100,000,000.00 to a company that make 1 billion dollars a year? It still have $900,000,000.00 to spread between it's owners and workforce and still save running and fashion another billion the subsequent year. And even if they lost $300,000,000.00 within one year plus remunerated $100,000,000.00 within 10% taxes it still leaves it near $600,000,000.00 million to divy up and reinvest. What in the world could I do next to $600,000,000.00? Left next to that meager amount I'd probably ask for a due break or for some senate agency to bail me out.
As for taxes on business, corporations, etc...what you must save surrounded by mind is that those entities DO NOT PAY TAXES. Only PEOPLE money taxes. Taxes to a business are nil more than overhead, in recent times resembling their electric bill, lease, etc. They outdo it on to individuals in the form of sophisticated prices, lower wages, or lower dividends to investors. What we requirement is a national sale toll such as the Fairtax Bill currently next contained by Congress. This give you a one-time importantly noticeable levy to replace our intrusive, cumbersome, and incomprehensible income excise system. Study the details and read the Bill at www.fairtax.org.
Sometimes we attempt to proffer simple answers to severely complex issues. A flat export tax on pride, greed, lust, anger, glutton, envy, sloth & lies may be a honest concept but not to replace the income export tax.
Good luck coming up next to bills for pride, anger, and envy taxes.
An income toll cross-examine in connection with short-term means gains/loss!?
We pay packet my mother surrounded by imperative to babysit our son.Are these payments import tax deductible?
How to work out TDS on income?
If I owe state excise to one state and I moved out of that state and moved to Texas. Do I still own to foot?
How different is HD DVD OR BLUE RAY TO DVD?
personal human shortcomings and defect, and want us to be
over tax and restricted starting near smoking, over weight
Why not a flat tariff for adjectives, Pride,Greed,Lust,Anger,Glutton...
Envy,Sloth & Lies.
Answers:
Haha! Good hypothesis! The falt export tax wants to transpire, 20% of what you formulate every year, no deduction would def. payoff contained by America! But the function for individuals wanting to export tax what you mentioned is because it is a financial drain to society, whereas the other mortal sins are not... or are they? LOL.
au contraire, Martin.
flat levy is a poor concept.
America, and other countries, should abolish income taxes completely and switch to taxing consumption instead. A national merit added export tax of equal percentage [17 to 20 percent] would give up ample revenue while increasing individuals's income and thus reducing poverty.
All taxes perform to mute the number of the amusement tax. This is covered surrounded by Economics 001 at university.
you settle on ... do you want to drop off the amount of work done, or would it be better to drain the amount of consumption done?
A flat levy would shift much of the duty burden from soaring income to low and middle income folks, but still would not do anything to excise the underground cutback - sounds similar to a genuine doomed to failure notion to me.
Good for you! However; Why not basically a simple 10% flat excise time? if respectively human being, respectively business, respectively corporation and adjectives foriegn investors compensated 10% of their proceeds, regardless of their losses, surrounded by a few years in that would be no inevitability for taxes every year and we'd be required to clear them every third year at the soonest.
Large corporations find to subtract their losses from their incom total and that's BS. If a personality cannot take off their losses from their income neither should a company. What really stinks almost the system is that a company is considered living - hah - I've never see a "company" at a dinner table across from me in any resteraunt. A company is simply one or more individuals, similar to you and me and and so respectively individual owner that reap any financial benefit from their company's existence should take-home pay 10% of that benefit and as a total the company should earnings 10% . You can't hold a loss in need have some sort of money to switch on next to. Please don't make clear to me that AT&T lost 2 Billion dollars within profit one year - heck, AT&T be still competent to repay it's owners a considerable amount of money and be competent to pay envelope it's workforce so why couldn't it settle up it's 10%? Oh, that's right, it's because the owners would enjoy gotten smaller number money. Guess what, that also finances their 10% would own be smaller number as in good health. What's $100,000,000.00 to a company that make 1 billion dollars a year? It still have $900,000,000.00 to spread between it's owners and workforce and still save running and fashion another billion the subsequent year. And even if they lost $300,000,000.00 within one year plus remunerated $100,000,000.00 within 10% taxes it still leaves it near $600,000,000.00 million to divy up and reinvest. What in the world could I do next to $600,000,000.00? Left next to that meager amount I'd probably ask for a due break or for some senate agency to bail me out.
As for taxes on business, corporations, etc...what you must save surrounded by mind is that those entities DO NOT PAY TAXES. Only PEOPLE money taxes. Taxes to a business are nil more than overhead, in recent times resembling their electric bill, lease, etc. They outdo it on to individuals in the form of sophisticated prices, lower wages, or lower dividends to investors. What we requirement is a national sale toll such as the Fairtax Bill currently next contained by Congress. This give you a one-time importantly noticeable levy to replace our intrusive, cumbersome, and incomprehensible income excise system. Study the details and read the Bill at www.fairtax.org.
Sometimes we attempt to proffer simple answers to severely complex issues. A flat export tax on pride, greed, lust, anger, glutton, envy, sloth & lies may be a honest concept but not to replace the income export tax.
Good luck coming up next to bills for pride, anger, and envy taxes.