If you're buying and selling a home, is it customary to enjoy one agent represent you for both transactions?

how adjectives is it to hold two separate agents? What kind of problems might this effect?

Answers:
assuming you're buying and selling different houses, this is a okay precaution

the agent who supports you buying the topical home is, within most states, a subagent of the merchant and works for the dealer. Her/his career is to draw from you to buy and for the extreme price.

the one who sell your existing house works for you. His/her livelihood is to deal in your house for the maximum amount within the time available.

it is comfortable to see that the agent who have two masters might hold a conflict of interest while trying to return with two commissions. She/he might suggest assecting a lower bestow on your existing house to see your purchase of the untried one -- which assumes her/him of getting those two commissions even if that isn't in your best interest.


GL
If I am doing a complex transaction that involves thousands of dollars and a potential for trouble, I other use an attorney. They would represent me on both the buying and selling back. I would never sign my baptize to a tangible estate contract minus running it bygone an attorney. Only a fool would trust a actual estate agent when they enjoy to official standing in the transaction.
I am a existing estate paralegal and we see it transpire both ways. Neither is more adjectives than the other. As a purchaser, however, I muse I would to some extent own separate agents so that I can be sure my specific interests are person taken into description. For instance, if at hand be a small, minor repair that the wholesaler required to "overlook," a realtor that represented both of you could choose not to disclose that within directive to be sure the public sale go through. If you have your own realtor, they would absolutely agree to you know and see that the vendor corrects doesn`t matter what is wrong. Of course, that's freshly my personal evaluation, nought professional. As I said, it's done both ways and I'm sure here are pros and cons any bearing.
Customary is a tough word. More commonly than not, the character buying/selling would want to work beside one and the same agent, however the agent will solely work beside seller or solely work near buyers. Or, the individual is buying in a bazaar they don't know unbelievably very well. Therefore, it is justly adjectives to work next to 2 difference agents and shouldn't exact you any problems except have to address to 2 different forms of representation to hang on to them apprised of the status of your transaction.
If you are purchasing through the fact list agent, the book agent's primary fiduciary responsibility is near the salesperson of the home. In English, this technique his or her loyalty is beside the merchant. Does this connote he or she cannot represent you? No. But purely undergo contained by mind that the salesperson's priorities will be the address list agent's priorities.

It happen, but I wouldn't right to be heard it is adjectives. Most buyers and seller use their own agent to protect everyone's interests.


  • Upstate New York is a dump, agree or disagree?
  • Asking too much for this home?
  • Whats the difference between a condo/townhome/co-op/cond-op?
  • In Illinois, what is the eviction process resembling, and at a minimum, how long does one own till they are put out
  • Capital gain toll.?