Options: How are they financially back?
I saw a statistic that approximately 60% of options are closed out, 30% expire worthless, and only 10% are in actual fact exercised. As long as options traders are making a profit (the fact that they exist assumes they are), afterwards these closed out options are drawing extremely large sums of money out of some unknown place. Where is this money coming from? Thanks!
Answers: First, you requirement to understand that options are a "zero-sum" system. For respectively dollar one person makes on an substitute another person loses one dollar. This is true because for every long position there is an offset short position. So, you can say the profits that some people brand name are financed by the losses others experience. If you add all the profits and losses from option trades, ignoring the "friction" caused by commissions and fees, the sum will be nil.
However, options do not trade in a vacuum. As a result, it is possible for both the wholesaler and the buyer of an option to make a profit. A simple example is a covered telephone call. Suppose I just bought 100 shares of XYZ stock for $50 per share and I decide I want to put on the market it if it is trading at or above $55 per share a month from now. I decide flog a call option near a $55 strike price for a $1 per share premium. For our example, let's say Harold bought the option I sold for $1 per share. Now assume that at expiration one month from in a minute the stock is trading at $60 per share. Harold exercises the option, buys the stock from me for $55 per share, and promptly sells the stock for the $60 per share.
My profit per share be
$55 + $1 - $50 = $6 per share.
Harold's profit per share was
$60 - $1 - $55 = $4 per share.
If you just look at the preference it was worth $5 when Harold exercised it, so I lost $4 per share on the option and Harold made $4 per share on the selection, giving the zero sum. However, when you include the stock profits we both made money and it was not a zero-sum system.
So, the answer to "where on earth does the money come from" is that the money comes from other option traders.
The question "How are they financially back?" is a different issue. Options are backed at three levels. First is the individual trader. If I write an resort I am assuming financial responsibility for fulfilling my obligation if assigned. Second is my brokerage. If I do not fulfill my obligation my brokerage is required to fulfill it. Third and finally is the Option Clearing Corporation or OCC. If neither I nor my broker fulfill my must, the OCC is required to fulfill it.
BTW, there is not such thing as the "Options Clearing Council" insinuation in a previous response.
Options are backed by the OCC choice clearing corporation. The stats you saw are relatively correct. Closing out and option is doing the opposite from what you started near. Money is changing hands from investor to investor. Money isn't freshly created and given out. If I want to sell options someone have to be willing and able to buy the option I want to sell just approaching the stock exchanges. The money comes from the Options Clearing Council, the exchange, the brokers who pay the investors or traders - which really, ultimately, comes from other invetors and traders.
You "get more roar for the buck" trading options.
Options have the item of time and time decay goping against them.
The losses are already known. A trader KNOWS he/she cannot lose any more than the cost of the opportunity.
To learn more about option trading, here's a free AND VERY helpful site:
http://optionseducation.org
That site basically "spoon feeds" those folks who would similar to to learn more about trading option.
Thanks for asking your Q! I enjoyed answering it!
VTY,
Ron Berue
Yes, that is my concrete last name!
Closed out system that the seller is buying it back and the buyer is selling it support. They are reversing the path of money used to open the positions. If someone is paying more than the get when they sold, they either use money prom profitable positions or risk capital. Options are change settlement (T+1)
How did Arshad Mehta cheated contained by stock bazaar?
I enjoy over a million usd looking for immigration!?
Looking for a unique type of grease stock...?
I'm 19 and I want to buy a stock, how can I do that?
How do you buy interest rate swap?
I really necessitate some lend a hand near this?
Fundamental expediency of an leeway?
What are the short and long possession performances of IPO's?
Answers: First, you requirement to understand that options are a "zero-sum" system. For respectively dollar one person makes on an substitute another person loses one dollar. This is true because for every long position there is an offset short position. So, you can say the profits that some people brand name are financed by the losses others experience. If you add all the profits and losses from option trades, ignoring the "friction" caused by commissions and fees, the sum will be nil.
However, options do not trade in a vacuum. As a result, it is possible for both the wholesaler and the buyer of an option to make a profit. A simple example is a covered telephone call. Suppose I just bought 100 shares of XYZ stock for $50 per share and I decide I want to put on the market it if it is trading at or above $55 per share a month from now. I decide flog a call option near a $55 strike price for a $1 per share premium. For our example, let's say Harold bought the option I sold for $1 per share. Now assume that at expiration one month from in a minute the stock is trading at $60 per share. Harold exercises the option, buys the stock from me for $55 per share, and promptly sells the stock for the $60 per share.
My profit per share be
$55 + $1 - $50 = $6 per share.
Harold's profit per share was
$60 - $1 - $55 = $4 per share.
If you just look at the preference it was worth $5 when Harold exercised it, so I lost $4 per share on the option and Harold made $4 per share on the selection, giving the zero sum. However, when you include the stock profits we both made money and it was not a zero-sum system.
So, the answer to "where on earth does the money come from" is that the money comes from other option traders.
The question "How are they financially back?" is a different issue. Options are backed at three levels. First is the individual trader. If I write an resort I am assuming financial responsibility for fulfilling my obligation if assigned. Second is my brokerage. If I do not fulfill my obligation my brokerage is required to fulfill it. Third and finally is the Option Clearing Corporation or OCC. If neither I nor my broker fulfill my must, the OCC is required to fulfill it.
BTW, there is not such thing as the "Options Clearing Council" insinuation in a previous response.
Options are backed by the OCC choice clearing corporation. The stats you saw are relatively correct. Closing out and option is doing the opposite from what you started near. Money is changing hands from investor to investor. Money isn't freshly created and given out. If I want to sell options someone have to be willing and able to buy the option I want to sell just approaching the stock exchanges. The money comes from the Options Clearing Council, the exchange, the brokers who pay the investors or traders - which really, ultimately, comes from other invetors and traders.
You "get more roar for the buck" trading options.
Options have the item of time and time decay goping against them.
The losses are already known. A trader KNOWS he/she cannot lose any more than the cost of the opportunity.
To learn more about option trading, here's a free AND VERY helpful site:
http://optionseducation.org
That site basically "spoon feeds" those folks who would similar to to learn more about trading option.
Thanks for asking your Q! I enjoyed answering it!
VTY,
Ron Berue
Yes, that is my concrete last name!
Closed out system that the seller is buying it back and the buyer is selling it support. They are reversing the path of money used to open the positions. If someone is paying more than the get when they sold, they either use money prom profitable positions or risk capital. Options are change settlement (T+1)