More Specific Follow-Up Option Question?
Say company XYZ has a total of 100 shares outstanding. Current market price is 30. Say bank, investors, the Options Clearing Corporation, The American Stock exchange, and/or The Chicago Board of Investors (I don't know who writes options) write over 100 calls to accommodate different market conditions and strike prices respectively. For this example, the average for these hypothetical call is 35. If there are over a hundred calls, some own to be naked or uncovered, right?
Let’s say the souk price of the sock increases to 60 and everyone who purchased the calls decides to exercise them. What happen? Can this happen, a lack of underlying securities? How is this prevented? Who is responsible? That is why I don't take in how options are initially issued and who issues them. And that is my major question: Who issues the options innitially and how do they hold that ability?
Answers: Options are a zero sum team game. For ever winner, there is a loser.
Most option are settled in cash and not exercised for the underlying stock. Options are purchased to any speculate in a movement (up or down) in a stock or to stall a position. One of the incentives to buy an option is the leverage it produces. The increased leverage increases the potential gain. Exercising the option (if you are ahead) essentially reduce the leverage and is somewhat counterintuitive.
The OCC has rules to prevent unusual situations such as your hypothetical and can decide how settlements are handle. For example, if everyone wanted shares delivered and here were not enough available (on deposit contained by the accounts of those who sold the option), the OCC could decide that some holders would have to adopt cash settlement instead of shares. The exchanges have surveillance team that watch for unusual trading and situations, and can make adjustment (limiting naked options or increasing margin). The created the remedy contracts and the rules for how they operate.
Most companies have millions of shares of outstanding, publicly traded stock, yet near aren't usually that many option contracts outstanding. Before option can be listed on a stock, one of the criteria is that the stock have all right liquidity, so that the type of imbalances that you ask about are not probable to occur.
Naked or uncovered situations can occur but the function of the OCC and the Exchanges is to insure that respectively side of the option trade has the cleverness to settle their obligation, usually through the requirement that margin be posted. Usually brokerage firms will not allow information holders to be uncovered unless sufficient margin is posted or the total account worth is enough to be liquidated to sort good on the account holder's must. If not, the brokerage firm could be held responsible for making good on its account holder's constraint.
Options are issued by the Options Clearing Corporation
The OCC, AMEX, do not write options they are exchanges, (or market placesl thefore they do not trade)
OCC will not issue selection contracts for any publically traded company that exceed the total amount of stock outstanding
"how do they have that ability" because they know what they are doing. technically all exchanges know how abundant shares their companies that are listed with them hold outstanding, therefore they know how many contracts can be issued. There be a data base near this info that was used by OCC
Limit VS Stop VS Stop Limit instructions?
Do Forex auto pilot programs work?
What shares should i buy? (asx)?
Anyone know why Magellan Energy's stock have fall so drastically?
Cbot trading floor devotion?
What is option trading?
How can a 14 year feeble construct in the region of 100 dollars surrounded by 1 week?
ATTENTION PROFITABLE FOREX TRADERS: what type of indicators do you use (fibbonacci, bollinger band, Elli...?
Let’s say the souk price of the sock increases to 60 and everyone who purchased the calls decides to exercise them. What happen? Can this happen, a lack of underlying securities? How is this prevented? Who is responsible? That is why I don't take in how options are initially issued and who issues them. And that is my major question: Who issues the options innitially and how do they hold that ability?
Answers: Options are a zero sum team game. For ever winner, there is a loser.
Most option are settled in cash and not exercised for the underlying stock. Options are purchased to any speculate in a movement (up or down) in a stock or to stall a position. One of the incentives to buy an option is the leverage it produces. The increased leverage increases the potential gain. Exercising the option (if you are ahead) essentially reduce the leverage and is somewhat counterintuitive.
The OCC has rules to prevent unusual situations such as your hypothetical and can decide how settlements are handle. For example, if everyone wanted shares delivered and here were not enough available (on deposit contained by the accounts of those who sold the option), the OCC could decide that some holders would have to adopt cash settlement instead of shares. The exchanges have surveillance team that watch for unusual trading and situations, and can make adjustment (limiting naked options or increasing margin). The created the remedy contracts and the rules for how they operate.
Most companies have millions of shares of outstanding, publicly traded stock, yet near aren't usually that many option contracts outstanding. Before option can be listed on a stock, one of the criteria is that the stock have all right liquidity, so that the type of imbalances that you ask about are not probable to occur.
Naked or uncovered situations can occur but the function of the OCC and the Exchanges is to insure that respectively side of the option trade has the cleverness to settle their obligation, usually through the requirement that margin be posted. Usually brokerage firms will not allow information holders to be uncovered unless sufficient margin is posted or the total account worth is enough to be liquidated to sort good on the account holder's must. If not, the brokerage firm could be held responsible for making good on its account holder's constraint.
Options are issued by the Options Clearing Corporation
The OCC, AMEX, do not write options they are exchanges, (or market placesl thefore they do not trade)
OCC will not issue selection contracts for any publically traded company that exceed the total amount of stock outstanding
"how do they have that ability" because they know what they are doing. technically all exchanges know how abundant shares their companies that are listed with them hold outstanding, therefore they know how many contracts can be issued. There be a data base near this info that was used by OCC