Financial organization,?
portfolio containing two assets,L Nand M.Asset L will represent 40% of the dollar good point of the portfolio,and asset M will vindication for the other 60%.The expected returns over the subsequent 6 years,2001-2006,for respectively of these assets are shown surrounded by the ff table:
Year Asset L Asset M
2001 14% 20%
2002 14 18
2003 16 16
2004 17 14
2005 17 12
2006 19 10
Calculate the expected portfolio over the 6 yrs-period,divide the standard deviation over the 6-year
Answers:
Only complete criminals can modify the Returns for closed accounting period :-) .. so I assume the 'expected returns' 2001-6 are 'actual returns' ..
Since the possession 'Portfolio' is used, it's a sound guess that the assets contained by query are Company Shares (rather than Bonds etc).
Unfortunately it is unstipulated how the returns are made up = the % shown are plainly too substantial to be commonplace Dividends (or Bond yeilds), so we hold to assume at most minuscule some part of the pack is made up of Capital gain (in reality, any share paying consistant dividends approaching these can be expected to rise contained by effectiveness by between 30 and 50%..).. surrounded by which armour should we also assume that the Portfolio is rebalanced respectively year ?
Do your own homework!
I hold $1,000 to put away upfront and later $500 a month after to that?
US Budget - unused funds?
Am I too childish?
Dates contributing to roth ira?
What are the safest investment instruments to collect income on 1,000,000 dollars to retire at age 35?
Year Asset L Asset M
2001 14% 20%
2002 14 18
2003 16 16
2004 17 14
2005 17 12
2006 19 10
Calculate the expected portfolio over the 6 yrs-period,divide the standard deviation over the 6-year
Answers:
Only complete criminals can modify the Returns for closed accounting period :-) .. so I assume the 'expected returns' 2001-6 are 'actual returns' ..
Since the possession 'Portfolio' is used, it's a sound guess that the assets contained by query are Company Shares (rather than Bonds etc).
Unfortunately it is unstipulated how the returns are made up = the % shown are plainly too substantial to be commonplace Dividends (or Bond yeilds), so we hold to assume at most minuscule some part of the pack is made up of Capital gain (in reality, any share paying consistant dividends approaching these can be expected to rise contained by effectiveness by between 30 and 50%..).. surrounded by which armour should we also assume that the Portfolio is rebalanced respectively year ?
Do your own homework!