Do big money manager fix the stock bazaar?

The stock marketplace have be acting peculiar lately. It reach Dow 14,000 and didn't stay in that. Three weeks then it hit Dow 12,500...and didn't stay in attendance. Within minutes it shot up 300 points to 12, 800.

Now it's stuck in the middle, edging difficult until it get to another parameter, and perchance will do alike entity again.

This can't be unexciting investors and traders. I believe it's be established by those ethnic group who control greatly of stock and buy and put on the market for the tons different funds.

Good communication or bleak communication (and in that's lots of discouraging communication lately), doesn't come across to affect the stock marketplace as much as these blustery gyrations according to parameter.

Agree?

Answers:
nearby own be explanations for the bazaar volitility that I found plausible. you used the word manipulation, which I muse of surrounded by this context as an intent to gain benefit by controlling adequate of the open market to artificially tilt or lower prices and afterwards exploit that difference. I doubt the volume money manager are doing that, as at hand is a comfortable circumstances of information something like what they are doing and it would be reported promptly.

If its any consolation, the hunt brothers tried to corner the open market on silver a long time ago and they get burned pretty polite if memory serves me correctly.

The flea market get unusual when general public don't know what to expect. One entry I read concluding week be that the bazaar have be waiting for the feed to speak something like a rate fade, and it bounced around a while until they finally said the sleight of hand words.

immediately its hurricane season again and the punch futures are getting expensive. let see what that does.

If we adjectives know the marketplace be going up every year and by how much, it would be instantly capture within futures trading and nearby would be nil to wonder nearly :)
No. Money manager respond to the word a short time ago similar to small investors. Though they see it sooner and enjoy more detailed information available. They also hold the proficiency to name the company and acquire clarification. The difference is that their buy/sell decision involve much larger volumes which have a more pronounced effect on the price. Since they commonly can not gross the desired trade within one trade, it is broken into several which produces a ladder effect.

Money manager and corporate insiders do at times falsify a single stock. When that happen they risk getting sued or going to send to prison. The SEC, lawyer, and substantial investors are watching.
A little bit. I am not an expert by any technique but for example if you check the top 10 holdings of several US stock (growth or income) funds you will see Exxon Mobil for example. If heaps money manager buy this stock logically its price increases and since they are an institution investor they hold much more money and smaller number expenses than an individual so they can buy up more shares.

There are other smaller "tricks" and others I am innocent of but folks close to the Fed and big/influential mutual fund companies and/or money manager enjoy quicker access to a company's most recent financial reports, executives, etc. and can craft better projections which affect stocks surrounded by the meantime. This is not immoral insider trading stuff any but a end in and effect type of article.

However within the short permanent status (days to months) the stock bazaar make as much sense as reading a book backwards, in the darkened and through a kaleidoscope. My $0.02


  • What is the best opening to momentum trade stocks and such?
  • So, be these final couple of weeks the big bazaar correction everyone be looking for? Or is here more?
  • How can a human being contained by America invest in the UK stock open market?
  • How to supply a product that nobody desires to buy?
  • I would resembling to know something like invesment in Dinar Iraq,can someboby endow with an warning?? gratefulness...?