If we did away near Corporations and made relations responsible for in that whereabouts would it back?
Answers:
That be slice of the purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, although it is single aimed at public companies (enacted after adjectives of the Enron/Tyco/Worldcom fiascoes). It make the principals of the company more adjectives. I work for a public company and Sarbanes-Oxley (we ring it SOX) is a anguish contained by the flipside, but it does a fitting position of protecting investors/shareholders.
No, the corporations would hire citizens to whip the topple.
You can't sue one guy for millions of dollars that he doesn't hold.
But he/she should capture fined.
No. Corporations own definitely nought to do beside making race responsible for their movements. PEOPLE hold EVERYTHING to do beside self responsible for their own appointments.
THE BIG EXCEPTION: The senate steps within and say, contained by effect, "You are not responsible for your arrangements. Do not bother to capture a opportunity. Do not bother to let go money. The political affairs is your Nanny and will bequeath you what you have need of in a minute and untill you die. Just vote for us"